Becoming Part of the Solution --- Students Join Record Industry to Curb Illegal File-Sharing. By Sarmad Ali April 6, 2006 Page B5 THE RECORD INDUSTRY'S nearly three-year effort to clamp down on illegal file-sharing among college students has done little to stop the practice on campuses. Now, in an unusual reversal, a handful of students themselves are joining the fight against copyright abuse by their peers. Universities also are taking stronger measures to both clamp down and offer students alternatives. The University of California, Los Angeles, for example, has started offering legal file-sharing services on campus. An increasing number of students still use peer-to-peer networks for illegal downloads of copyrighted music, citing convenience, greater selection and the simple fact that they are free. In the U.S., the average number of peer-to-peer users who logged into file-sharing networks rose to more than 6.9 million in December from more than 5.5 million a year earlier, says BigChampagne LLC, which tracks peer-to-peer file-sharing networks. The Recording Industry Association of America, the music-industry trade group, believes most illegal file-sharers are students, mainly because they have more time to spend on downloading and often don't have enough spending money to buy legal music. In addition, they typically have free access to broadband Internet, which is essential for downloading and swapping big music files. Some students, however, are trying to become part of the solution by educating their peers about copyright laws, providing ways to seek legal advice and pointing to legitimate file-sharing services. At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, two students launched an electronic music library that their peers can use to listen to at least 2,000 contemporary and classical CDs through MIT's cable-TV network. MIT hasn't joined with legal music-service providers. Instead, its students can access an internal music store dubbed Library Access to Music Project, or LAMP. LAMP consists of 16 jukeboxes that students or professors can control and use to play their own CDs. The university doesn't charge students for listening to music. However, MIT pays royalty fees to organizations that collect licensing and royalty fees for composers and artists. The downsides are that the music is available only on MIT's campus and only students and professors with televisions or computer TV cards can listen. At Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania, two students founded a Web site called freeculture.org that aims to organize campuses nationwide by educating students on copyright issues. The group has 25 members who work with students at colleges from Maine to California, and some abroad as well. The group also has joined a social network called CopyNight, which organizes gatherings of people interested in changing copyright law. Alvin Fong, a student at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, has been helping students accused of downloading illegally to find lawyers and settle lawsuits with the music industry. Mr. Fong was among 40 Carnegie Mellon students sued by the RIAA last year. Ever since the music industry started to sue students over illegal downloads, universities themselves have become more vigilant in policing downloads and encouraging students to use alternatives such as legal online music stores. More than 90 universities have joined with legitimate music services, where students often either have a monthly subscription or pay per download. In some cases, the service is subsidized by universities and students don't have to pay directly. The University of Delaware has started taking serious action against students who download copyrighted songs and movies illegally, charging them up to $70 to delete copyrighted materials obtained without payment. The university's Web site has links to 14 legal music and movie sites such as www.epitonic.com and www.purevolume.com . Most of them allow students to listen and download music free. UCLA is using a homegrown piece of software the university calls the Quarantine Approach that automatically deactivates copyright violators' accounts by putting them in "quarantine," prohibiting them from accessing external networks until they sign an electronic statement showing they have deleted all illegally downloaded files. UCLA's proprietary system, produced by the school's administrative staff, acts when the university receives claims of online copyright infringement from outside sources. Texas A&M University-Kingsville is using software called CopySense Network Appliance that compares the material of the files swapped over peer-to-peer networks with that in a database of copyrighted works. If CopySense detects a match, it immediately prevents the files from being transferred or shared.